By Day 3 of Week 5
All Participants should post a response to at least one presentation based on your own research in the form of an edited, 3-paragraph, formal academic peer review. In your review, be sure to do the following:
· Assess the conceptualization, analysis, and synthesis of key research concepts presented.
· Evaluate whether the presentation provides a cohesive summary of the assigned concepts with an effective evaluation of their implications for global supply chain management research, as well as for business practices and social change initiatives.
· Assess whether the presenter made a meaningful academic argument or interpretation that demonstrated fluency with the material.
Important Note: To ensure that all presentations receive peer review, please respond first to a presentation that has not yet received a review.
Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and one or more additional scholarly sources.
Refer to the Participant Discussion Response Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.
Between Days 4 and 6 of Week 3
All course members (Presenters and Participants) should respond to at least two colleagues’ postings by addressing the following summative considerations that pertain specifically to the topics for this 2-week unit:
· In what ways do the readings provided in this 2-week unit’s Learning Resources and those identified by you and your colleagues answer important “so what?” questions in the field of global supply chain management?
· How are these readings potentially valuable to research in the field?
· Are there any notable gaps (i.e., contradictions, arguments, disagreements, or areas of divergence) within this set of readings that point to potential topics for future research?
· How would you follow up to extend or explore these gaps?
Please note that, for each response, you must include a minimum of one appropriately cited scholarly reference.
